Wednesday, October 6, 2010

RIDESHARE: Phish 06.25.1995

one more review to dredge up from memory from last week, and then i'll be caught up to what i listened to yesterday.  then i can go back to blogging about other things that actually matter.

RIDESHARE is my 2010 version of my old Madden 2003 franchise posts...

this '95 show (setlist here) was a pretty fascinating meld of the technically precise, no-holds-barred '94 sound and the more experimental spacy '96 sound.  like, in all the best ways.  first of all, the show starts with pretty standard but solid "ya mar" and "AC/DC Bag" (when does "AC/DC" ever really sound any different, anyway?), then immediately jumps into very early versions of "taste" and "theme from the bottom", both of which are instructive and exploratory.

to address my own setlist bias for a moment, i'm basically just in love with the first half of this set.  while i could generally take or leave "AC/DC bag", "ya mar", "taste", "theme", "if i could", "divided sky", and "i didn't know" in one set, even if they were terrible versions, would make a killer set in my opinion.  and these are far from terrible versions.  one of my favorite phish guilty pleasures are the noodle-guitar-and-piano jams at the end of songs like "if i could" and "squirming coil", and this "if i could" brings that jamming in spades.

this show has another great "scent of a mule" with some page pyrotechnics, though "maze" is, well, it's just "maze".  i've never really understood the appeal of that song.  the "mike's" > "why don't we do it in the road?" > "hold your head up" > "weekapaug" string is probably the highlight of the show.  again, i'm biased because i love the "mike's" > "weekapaug" duo as much as i love anything phish, but this version of "mike's" is particularly gnarly ("gnarly" in this case meaning "super dark guitar-led jamming").

overall, this show wasn't on the same level as some of the shows i've previously reviewed as far as setlists go, or as far as playing (there was a lot of technically great jamming, but a few of the songs went on for upwards of 10 minutes without actually really developing any themes or differentiation).  however, there were some standout moments (middle of each set) that would be worth another listen.

0 comments: